> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://committ.mintlify.site/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# January 5th, 2026

> No code written. Travelling from Saudi to India. But the recurring logic problem never left my mind.

# January 5th, 2026

> Sometimes the best work happens when you're not at your desk.

**The Day I Didn't Write Code**

Today I couldn't do any work.

I was travelling from Saudi Arabia to India — airports, flights, layovers, the whole thing.

No laptop open. No terminal. No commits.

But my mind never stopped working.

***

## The Context

**Q: What was actually happening?**

Physically: I was in transit.

Mentally: I was solving the recurring logic problem for CommitT.

This is the gap between "work" and "thinking about work" — and honestly, the thinking part might have been more valuable.

***

## The Problem That Wouldn't Leave

**Q: What was I processing?**

The recurring task logic.

Specifically: **How do we make recurring tasks production-ready?**

This isn't a small problem. It's the foundation of how CommitT actually works at scale.

***

## What Was Going Through My Mind

### The Core Question

If a user creates a recurring task:

* **Every Monday, 2 PM - 4 PM**
* **For the next 12 weeks**

What actually happens in production?

Do we:

1. Create 12 separate tasks upfront?
2. Generate them on-demand?
3. Store a rule and compute at runtime?

Each approach has trade-offs.

### The Constraints I Was Thinking About

* **Database size**: 1000 users × 52 weeks × 5 recurring tasks = 260,000 tasks. That's manageable but not trivial.
* **Query performance**: "What tasks exist right now?" must be instant. No loops. No computation.
* **Timezone handling**: A user in India and a user in Saudi Arabia see different "now". How do we handle that?
* **Modification**: If a user edits a recurring task, do we update all future instances or just new ones?
* **Cancellation**: If a user cancels one instance, does it affect the series?

### The Mental Model I Was Building

By the time I landed, I had a rough architecture in my head:

**Option A: Pre-generate all tasks**

* Pros: Simple queries, no runtime logic
* Cons: Wastes space, hard to modify

**Option B: Generate on-demand**

* Pros: Flexible, space-efficient
* Cons: Slower queries, complex caching

**Option C: Hybrid (what I think we'll do)**

* Generate tasks for the next 2 weeks
* Keep a rolling window
* Compute on-demand for edge cases

***

## Why This Matters

**Q: Why is this so important?**

Because the entire enforcement system depends on it.

If recurring logic is broken:

* Tasks don't exist when they should
* Penalties don't trigger
* Users think they're safe when they're not

This isn't a "nice to have". It's foundational.

***

## The Realization

**Q: What did I realize during the flight?**

That sometimes the best thinking happens when you're away from the code.

No distractions. No Slack. No "just one more commit".

Just you, a window seat, and a problem that won't let go.

***

## Where I Am Now

No code written today.

But the mental model is clearer.

The trade-offs are mapped.

The next time I sit down to code, I'll know exactly what to build.

***

## Honest Reflection

There's a weird guilt that comes with "not shipping" on a travel day.

But I think this kind of thinking is underrated.

The best code comes from clear thinking, not just fast typing.

Today was clear thinking.

That's enough.